From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Hawkins <a.hawkins@cabletime.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:16:09 -0000
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with u-boot, PPChameleonEVB and MontaVista kernel 
In-Reply-To: <20040224160912.3ECF1C0655@atlas.denx.de>
Message-ID: <002101c3faf1$83f88330$333335bf@cabletime.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Then you will either have to move all the  modifications  needed
for
> the PPCHameleon board into their kernel tree (thus creating
something
> which  again  is  not  the  original MV kernel), or have MV provide
a
> kernel extended in such way.

That's what I'm expecting to have to do, but unfortunately know where
to look for the changes I need to make is difficult.

> Yes, and this is your most  pressing  problem.  When  the
parameters
> passed  to  the  Linux  kernel are correct you will at least get
some
> boot messages, and see where the kernel crashes then (which  it
will
> do).

Well, I think I *have* matched up the two structures, but we're still
not seeing anything. Where can I put breakpoints in the kernel to try
to work out why we're not getting any boot messages?

> I think you can use another kernel  tree  (like  that  from  our
CVS
> server)  without problems. If you feel you must move our patches
into
> the MV tree please feel free to do so - all the history and
comments
> are available for free on our CVS server. You can extract the
patches
> that  are relevant for the PPChameleon board and try applying them
to
> the MV tree - I don't expect any serious problems there.

At the risk of asking newbie questions, how would I go about doing
this?

Thanks again for all the help so far, it's much appreciated.

Andy