From: Sangmoon Kim <dogoil@etinsys.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:37:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002c01c5a6db$8a115ed0$212d4cdc@smkim> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 430626AE.9030607@orkun.us
Dear Tolunay Orkun,
Sorry for late reply.
> I think this is wrong approach. These sectors are protected for a reason
>
But some chips(like 28F320C3 from intel) automatically
protect all sectors after reset.
Although the chips have good reasons to do it.
I think, some boards also have good reasons to undo it.
> You should enable CFG_FLASH_PROTECTION in your board config file. If you
> don't do this U-Boot will do software protection of sectors (which is
> really for those flash chips with no hardware protection capability) and
> "protect off" will not issue unlock commands as you may have witnessed.
>
That's right. Power-on-protected-automatically chips need both
CFG_FLASH_PROTECTION and CFG_FLASH_PROTECT_CLEAR flags.
> CFG_FLASH_PROTECTION will enable the "protect off" command to disable
> protection properly on these sectors as it should.
>
I don't think it is convenient to protect off sectors manually
which is automatically protected during power on.
Best regards,
Sangmoon Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-22 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 4:27 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-19 18:36 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 5:37 ` Sangmoon Kim [this message]
2005-08-22 6:31 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 7:13 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 15:37 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 16:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:49 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:41 ` Scott McNutt
2005-08-23 1:53 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 7:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 17:02 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 22:05 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 22:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-23 7:14 ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-23 8:39 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-23 14:47 ` Brian Waite
2005-08-23 20:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-24 5:58 ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-24 16:00 ` Detlev Zundel
2005-08-24 21:52 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-24 23:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-25 14:37 ` Brian Waite
2005-08-25 16:37 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-26 14:12 ` U-Boot policy on flash protection (was [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches) Detlev Zundel
2005-08-26 14:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-02-28 16:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 18:47 Woodruff, Richard
2005-08-19 20:16 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-19 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002c01c5a6db$8a115ed0$212d4cdc@smkim' \
--to=dogoil@etinsys.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox