From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Pont <andy.pont@sdcsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:57:16 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] dma: ti-edma3: Add BIT(x) macro
	definition
In-Reply-To: <1435922173-6531-10-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>
References: <1435922173-6531-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>
 <1435922173-6531-10-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>
Message-ID: <003901d0b598$33d79fd0$9b86df70$@pont@sdcsystems.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Vignesh wrote...

[snip]

> +#define BIT(x)					(1 << (x))
> +

Is this not something that would be better in a global header file somewhere rather than it starting a trend of a per-driver, per-arch, etc. definitions?

Andy.