From: Nils Le Roux <gilbsgilbert@gmail.com>
To: wefu@redhat.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de, bmeng@tinylab.org,
rick@andestech.com, trini@konsulko.com, dlan@gentoo.org,
joe.hershberger@ni.com, rfried.dev@gmail.com, ypron.glpk@gmx.de,
michal.simek@amd.com, randolph@andestech.com,
seashell11234455@gmail.com, peterlin@andestech.com,
samuel@sholland.org, wiagn233@outlook.com, jonas@kwiboo.se,
seanga2@gmail.com, baruch@tkos.co.il, kever.yang@rock-chips.com,
sjg@chromium.org, ycliang@andestech.com
Cc: tekkamanninja@gmail.com, tekkamanninja@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpu: add t-head's c9xx
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:30:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003d0b68-3784-4f04-a25e-e19cd41cc085@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327080817.44501-2-wefu@redhat.com>
Hi!
I tested this and it works fine. I also happen to have the glue layer ported
from the Linux somewhere on my machine. If you're interested, please
reach out
to me and I'll arrange a patch. I have a few remarks on this patch:
On 3/27/24 9:07 AM, wefu@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Fu <wefu@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <wefu@redhat.com>
> Co-authored-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++
> arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Makefile | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/cpu.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/dram.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 2 ++
> board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig | 3 +-
> 7 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index ac52c5e6da..ac3b802abe 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ source "arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/Kconfig"
> source "arch/riscv/cpu/fu740/Kconfig"
> source "arch/riscv/cpu/generic/Kconfig"
> source "arch/riscv/cpu/jh7110/Kconfig"
> +source "arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Kconfig"
>
> # architecture-specific options below
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..5a84bcacd6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Alibaba Group Holding Limited
> +
> +config RISCV_THEAD
> + bool
> + select ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
> + imply CPU
> + imply CPU_RISCV
> + imply RISCV_TIMER
> + imply RISCV_RDTIME
> + imply CMD_CPU
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Makefile b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..e3f776cb41
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Alibaba Group Holding Limited
> +
> +obj-y += cpu.o dram.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/cpu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..4b21edd62b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/cpu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Alibaba Group Holding Limited
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/cache.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <cpu_func.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * cleanup_before_linux() is called just before we call linux
> + * it prepares the processor for linux
> + *
> + * we disable interrupt and caches.
> + */
> +int cleanup_before_linux(void)
> +{
> + cache_flush();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void flush_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + register unsigned long i asm("a0") = start & ~(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE - 1);
Isn't this just round_down/ALIGN_DOWN macro?
> +
> + for (; i < end; i += CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
> + asm volatile(".long 0x0295000b"); /* dcache.cpa a0 */
> +
> + sync_is();
> +}
> +
> +void invalidate_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + register unsigned long i asm("a0") = start & ~(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> + for (; i < end; i += CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
> + asm volatile(".long 0x02b5000b"); /* dcache.cipa a0 */
`th.dcache.cipa` not only invalidates the dcache, but also flushes it
which is
not expected here. In practice, this leads to a bug with the dwmac
driver: when
U-Boot handles an ARP request, it overwrites the ARP request with the ARP
response in-place, directly in the ring buffer[^1]. When re-using the same
buffer later on, the driver will flush this data instead of invalidating
it[^2], and you'll read the ARP response you just sent instead of the packet
just written by the chip.
This can easily be reproduced by downloading a big file using TFTP. As
soon as
you receive an ARP request, U-Boot hangs, timeouts and requests the packet
again. It also makes TCP completely unusable.
You can use `th.dcache.ipa` instead, as implemented in
`invalid_dcache_range`.
[^1]
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/a5ec56aea1a56737a4e124d058a6920d16f5e686/net/arp.c#L154-L160
[^2]
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/a5ec56aea1a56737a4e124d058a6920d16f5e686/drivers/net/designware.c#L542
> +
> + sync_is();
> +}
> +
> +void invalid_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
I think this isn't used anywhere.
> +{
> + register unsigned long i asm("a0") = start & ~(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> + for (; i < end; i += CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
> + asm volatile(".long 0x02a5000b"); /* dcache.ipa a0 */
> +
> + sync_is();
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/dram.c b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/dram.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..614d7bf1cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/c9xx/dram.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <fdtdec.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +
> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> +
> +int dram_init(void)
> +{
> + return fdtdec_setup_mem_size_base();
> +}
> +
> +int dram_init_banksize(void)
> +{
> + return fdtdec_setup_memory_banksize();
> +}
> +
> +phys_size_t board_get_usable_ram_top(phys_size_t total_size)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Ensure that we run from first 4GB so that all
> + * addresses used by U-Boot are 32bit addresses.
> + *
> + * This in-turn ensures that 32bit DMA capable
> + * devices work fine because DMA mapping APIs will
> + * provide 32bit DMA addresses only.
> + */
> + if (gd->ram_top >= SZ_4G)
> + return SZ_4G - 1;
> +
> + return gd->ram_top;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> index 986f951c31..3102de6cbb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@
> #define CSR_MARCHID 0xf12
> #define CSR_MHARTID 0xf14
>
> +#define sync_is() asm volatile (".long 0x01b0000b")
> +
I believe this instruction is also T-Head specific (at least my disassembler
doesn't know it). I doubt it belongs here.
Best regards,
Nils
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> #define csr_swap(csr, val) \
> diff --git a/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig b/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig
> index 622246127c..bef0638e80 100644
> --- a/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig
> +++ b/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ config SYS_VENDOR
> default "thead"
>
> config SYS_CPU
> - default "generic"
> + default "c9xx"
>
> config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
> default "th1520_lpi4a"
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config SPL_OPENSBI_LOAD_ADDR
> config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS
> def_bool y
> select ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
> + select RISCV_THEAD
> imply CPU
> imply CPU_RISCV
> imply RISCV_TIMER if RISCV_SMODE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 8:07 [PATCH 0/6] riscv: adds T-Head C9xx basic and GMAC support wefu
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpu: add t-head's c9xx wefu
2024-03-27 13:30 ` Nils Le Roux [this message]
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] riscv/dts: add gmac node for th1520 wefu
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] riscv/dts: add gmac node for lichee-pi-4a wefu
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/designware: add compatible for "snps,dwmac" wefu
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] config/th1520_lpi4a_defconfig:enable designware ethernet & realtek phy wefu
2024-03-27 8:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] config/th1520_lpi4a.h: add more env option for booting linux wefu
2024-03-27 12:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] riscv: adds T-Head C9xx basic and GMAC support Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=003d0b68-3784-4f04-a25e-e19cd41cc085@gmail.com \
--to=gilbsgilbert@gmail.com \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=bmeng@tinylab.org \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=joe.hershberger@ni.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=peterlin@andestech.com \
--cc=randolph@andestech.com \
--cc=rfried.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=rick@andestech.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=seashell11234455@gmail.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=tekkamanninja@163.com \
--cc=tekkamanninja@gmail.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
--cc=wiagn233@outlook.com \
--cc=ycliang@andestech.com \
--cc=ypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox