From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Pont Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:21:17 -0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] rockchip: rk3288: use spl_early_init() instead of spl_init() In-Reply-To: <20170315000634.31211-2-sjg@chromium.org> References: <20170315000634.31211-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20170315000634.31211-2-sjg@chromium.org> Message-ID: <00a701d29d65$1fec6710$5fc53530$@sdcsystems.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Simon wrote... > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c b/arch/arm/mach- > rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c > index e51e19bb2d..f494843663 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > debug_uart_init(); > #endif > > - ret = spl_init(); > + ret = spl_early_init(); > if (ret) { > debug("spl_init() failed: %d\n", ret); Shouldn't the function name used in the debug statement be changed to spl_early_init()? -Andy.