From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:05:34 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improveU-Boot configuration... References: <46597312D56D2A47A3A6E9C1D0D9B7AEB0C2C0@kpladc0001.konzeptpark.intra> Message-ID: <00ac01c7b37f$25a04f30$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > FWIW, I fully support going this direction. I've been making some > steps in the same direction, but as always there are more things to do > than time to do them in. > > My advice: start small and don't try to change too much at once. Get > the basic infrastructure in place and get the patches out to the list. > Maybe start with being able to select the board port with Kconfig > while leaving include/configs/* in place. Once that is working and > proven, then start migrating configuation over to Kconfig. > I think it might be worthwhile to see if we long term can merge the configuration with the Linux configuration I think some of the configuration items could be the same and could therefore use the same name. Will U-Boot break, if the Linux .config is included in the Makefile? Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson