From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vipin KUMAR Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:05:46 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/9] Added support for SPEAr SoCs In-Reply-To: <1262888474.29396.1956.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1262865390-2016-1-git-send-email-vipin.kumar@st.com> <1262888474.29396.1956.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <010101ca901c$0d99d5b0$28cd8110$@kumar@st.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Peter, > > This patch set is a reworked patch which incorporates all review > feedbacks from > > earlier earlier mails > > > > This patch set contains the support for 4 SoCs > > SPEAr600 > > SPEAr300 > > SPEAr310 > > SPEAr320 > > > > SPEAr is an ARM based SoC which supports rich set of peripherals like > Ethernet, > > USB Host, USB Device etc to support various general > applications > > > > For further info on SPEAr SoC, please see README.spear also contained > in the > > patch set. > > > > Vipin (9): > > Added README.spear > > SPEAr600 SoC support added > > SPEAr300 SoC support added > > SPEAr310 SoC support added > > SPEAr320 SoC support added > > i2c driver support for SPEAr SoCs > > smi driver support for SPEAr SoCs > > nand(fsmc) driver support for SPEAr SoCs > > usbd driver support for SPEAr SoCs > > It would be nice if you reordered the patches. At a glance, some of > the > boards added first rely on drivers added later. Eg patch 1 uses the > I2C > driver in patch 6. This will cause 'git bisects' to break. To prevent > this you should add SOC + driver code first, then boards last. > Something like: > > 1. Initial SPEAr SOC support > 2. SPEAr: Add I2C support > 3. SPEAr: Add SMI support > .... > 6. Add SPEAr 600 board support > 7. Add SPEAr 300 board support > 8. Add SPEAr 310 board support > 9. Add SPEAr 320 board support > I am planning to keep the patch order as it is but I would remove dependencies eg. SPEAr600 would not contain code that depends on a driver added later and so on. This should also be OK. Right? Regards, Vipin