public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: "'Judith Mendez'" <jm@ti.com>, "'Peng Fan'" <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	"'Tom Rini'" <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: "'Nitin Yadav'" <n-yadav@ti.com>,
	"'Simon Glass'" <sjg@chromium.org>, <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Add itap_del_ena[] to store itapdlyena bit
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:34:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01fd01da90bb$28fc5300$7af4f900$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415212747.2678974-4-jm@ti.com>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 6:28 AM
> To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>; Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>; Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> Cc: Nitin Yadav <n-yadav@ti.com>; Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Add itap_del_ena[] to store itapdlyena bit
> 
> Set itap_del_ena if ITAPDLY is found in DT or if the tuning
> algorithm was executed and found the optimal ITAPDLY. Add the
> functionality to save ITAPDLYENA that can be referenced later
> by storing the bit in array itap_del_ena[].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/am654_sdhci.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/am654_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/am654_sdhci.c
> index 1dd032e1e36..38f1ad28ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/am654_sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/am654_sdhci.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct am654_sdhci_plat {
>  	bool non_removable;
>  	u32 otap_del_sel[MMC_MODES_END];
>  	u32 itap_del_sel[MMC_MODES_END];
> +	u32 itap_del_ena[MMC_MODES_END];
>  	u32 trm_icp;
>  	u32 drv_strength;
>  	u32 strb_sel;
> @@ -223,8 +224,10 @@ static int am654_sdhci_setup_dll(struct am654_sdhci_plat *plat,
>  }
> 
>  static void am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(struct am654_sdhci_plat *plat,
> -				      u32 itapdly)
> +				      u32 itapdly, u32 enable)
>  {
> +	regmap_update_bits(plat->base, PHY_CTRL4, ITAPDLYENA_MASK,
> +			   enable << ITAPDLYENA_SHIFT);
>  	/* Set ITAPCHGWIN before writing to ITAPDLY */
>  	regmap_update_bits(plat->base, PHY_CTRL4, ITAPCHGWIN_MASK,
>  			   1 << ITAPCHGWIN_SHIFT);
> @@ -242,7 +245,8 @@ static void am654_sdhci_setup_delay_chain(struct am654_sdhci_plat *plat,
>  	mask = SELDLYTXCLK_MASK | SELDLYRXCLK_MASK;
>  	regmap_update_bits(plat->base, PHY_CTRL5, mask, val);
> 
> -	am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, plat->itap_del_sel[mode]);
> +	am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, plat->itap_del_sel[mode],
> +				  plat->itap_del_ena[mode]);
>  }
> 
>  static int am654_sdhci_set_ios_post(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -443,6 +447,7 @@ static int am654_sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc *mmc, u8 opcode)
>  	struct udevice *dev = mmc->dev;
>  	struct am654_sdhci_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
>  	struct window fail_window[ITAPDLY_LENGTH];
> +	int mode = mmc->selected_mode;
>  	u8 curr_pass, itap;
>  	u8 fail_index = 0;
>  	u8 prev_pass = 1;
> @@ -450,11 +455,10 @@ static int am654_sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc *mmc, u8 opcode)
>  	memset(fail_window, 0, sizeof(fail_window));
> 
>  	/* Enable ITAPDLY */
> -	regmap_update_bits(plat->base, PHY_CTRL4, ITAPDLYENA_MASK,
> -			   1 << ITAPDLYENA_SHIFT);
> +	plat->itap_del_ena[mode] = 0x1;

0x1 means "enable"? I want to use a macro with meaning.

> 
>  	for (itap = 0; itap < ITAPDLY_LENGTH; itap++) {
> -		am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, itap);
> +		am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, itap, plat->itap_del_ena[mode]);
> 
>  		curr_pass = !mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL);
> 
> @@ -478,7 +482,7 @@ static int am654_sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc *mmc, u8 opcode)
>  	itap = am654_sdhci_calculate_itap(dev, fail_window, fail_index,
>  					  plat->dll_enable);
> 
> -	am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, itap);
> +	am654_sdhci_write_itapdly(plat, itap, plat->itap_del_ena[mode]);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -515,6 +519,7 @@ static int j721e_4bit_sdhci_set_ios_post(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  	struct am654_sdhci_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
>  	int mode = host->mmc->selected_mode;
>  	u32 otap_del_sel;
> +	u32 itap_del_ena;
>  	u32 itap_del_sel;
>  	u32 mask, val;
> 
> @@ -524,10 +529,11 @@ static int j721e_4bit_sdhci_set_ios_post(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  	val = (1 << OTAPDLYENA_SHIFT) |
>  	      (otap_del_sel << OTAPDLYSEL_SHIFT);
> 
> +	itap_del_ena = plat->itap_del_ena[mode];
>  	itap_del_sel = plat->itap_del_sel[mode];
> 
>  	mask |= ITAPDLYENA_MASK | ITAPDLYSEL_MASK;
> -	val = (1 << ITAPDLYENA_SHIFT) |
> +	val = (itap_del_ena << ITAPDLYENA_SHIFT) |
>  	      (itap_del_sel << ITAPDLYSEL_SHIFT);
> 
>  	regmap_update_bits(plat->base, PHY_CTRL4, ITAPCHGWIN_MASK,
> @@ -599,9 +605,13 @@ static int sdhci_am654_get_otap_delay(struct udevice *dev,
>  			cfg->host_caps &= ~td[i].capability;
>  		}
> 
> -		if (td[i].itap_binding)
> -			dev_read_u32(dev, td[i].itap_binding,
> -				     &plat->itap_del_sel[i]);
> +		if (td[i].itap_binding) {
> +			ret = dev_read_u32(dev, td[i].itap_binding,
> +					   &plat->itap_del_sel[i]);
> +
> +			if (!ret)
> +				plat->itap_del_ena[i] = 0x1;

Ditto.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> +		}
>  	}
> 
>  	return 0;
> --
> 2.43.2



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 21:27 [PATCH 0/5] Fix MMC tuning algorithm Judith Mendez
2024-04-15 21:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Add tuning algorithm for delay chain Judith Mendez
2024-04-17 11:23   ` Jaehoon Chung
2024-04-18 14:28     ` Judith Mendez
2024-04-15 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Fix OTAP/ITAP delay values Judith Mendez
2024-04-17 11:28   ` Jaehoon Chung
2024-04-18 14:39     ` Judith Mendez
2024-04-15 21:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Add itap_del_ena[] to store itapdlyena bit Judith Mendez
2024-04-17 11:34   ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2024-04-18 14:40     ` Judith Mendez
2024-04-15 21:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Set ENDLL=1 for DDR52 mode Judith Mendez
2024-04-17 11:36   ` Jaehoon Chung
2024-04-15 21:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] mmc: am654_sdhci: Fix ITAPDLY for HS400 timing Judith Mendez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01fd01da90bb$28fc5300$7af4f900$@samsung.com' \
    --to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=n-yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox