Re: [PATCH] dm: core: ofnode: Fix error message in ofnode_read_bootscript_address/flash()

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>]

On 9/11/23 15:30, Michal Simek wrote:
> Missing u-boot node shouldn't be visible in bootlog without debug enabled
> that's why change message from printf to debug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/core/ofnode.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> index 2d82f38db36d..df2d7fdd535c 100644
> --- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ int ofnode_read_bootscript_address(u64 *bootscr_address, u64 *bootscr_offset)
>   
>   	uboot = ofnode_path("/options/u-boot");
>   	if (!ofnode_valid(uboot)) {
> -		printf("%s: Missing /u-boot node\n", __func__);
> +		debug("%s: Missing /u-boot node\n", __func__);
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ int ofnode_read_bootscript_flash(u64 *bootscr_flash_offset,
>   
>   	uboot = ofnode_path("/options/u-boot");
>   	if (!ofnode_valid(uboot)) {
> -		printf("%s: Missing /u-boot node\n", __func__);
> +		debug("%s: Missing /u-boot node\n", __func__);
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   

It is only called for our platform right that's why I will take it via my tree 
where origin patch is.

Applied.

Thanks,
Michal