[U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip i nit.

[U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip i nit.

[Woodruff, Richard]

What aspect didn't work for you?  Its all pretty simple, and derived from
the kernel driver.  Its worked on my ARM boards with out problem since 1.0.0
was release.

As far as these patches having conflicts, they were conflict free as of
1.0.0 and the conflicts were probably added in by you the day before. I
don't mind grabbing the day newer versions and merging to those.  It can be
a bit of a pain to do direct CVS checkouts from where my machine sits.
Prior to doing any kind of big merge I usually just get tars off of your
site.  If you post a tar I will apply against that quicker.

Regards,

Richard W.

-----Original Message-----
From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de] 
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Woodruff, Richard
Cc: 'u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip
init. 

In message <71555548814716479478431542AA5F8A059043@dlee2k04.ent.ti.com> you
wrote:
>
> Seems I did the order wrong in the diff.  Here is the corrected version.

Does not work either. It conflicts with the current  version  of  the
source in CVS. Can you please check, and resubmit?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
"Just Say No."   - Nancy Reagan
"No."            - Ronald Reagan

[U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip i nit.

[Stephan Linz]

Am Dienstag,  9. Dezember 2003 14:27 schrieb Woodruff, Richard:
> What aspect didn't work for you?  Its all pretty simple, and derived from
> the kernel driver.  Its worked on my ARM boards with out problem since
> 1.0.0 was release.

The patch isn't wrong, but standing in conflict with a patch I've posted two 
or three weeks ago. Last weekend Wolfgang have put my patch into CVS tree 
befor working on your patch. So your patch conflicts.


>
> As far as these patches having conflicts, they were conflict free as of
> 1.0.0 and the conflicts were probably added in by you the day before. I
> don't mind grabbing the day newer versions and merging to those.  It can be
> a bit of a pain to do direct CVS checkouts from where my machine sits.
> Prior to doing any kind of big merge I usually just get tars off of your
> site.  If you post a tar I will apply against that quicker.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard W.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: Woodruff, Richard
> Cc: 'u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip
> init.
>
> In message <71555548814716479478431542AA5F8A059043@dlee2k04.ent.ti.com> you
>
> wrote:
> > Seems I did the order wrong in the diff.  Here is the corrected version.
>
> Does not work either. It conflicts with the current  version  of  the
> source in CVS. Can you please check, and resubmit?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Stephan Linz



======================================================================
Stephan Linz
Softwareentwicklung

MAZeT GmbH                   Email: mailto:linz at mazet.de
G?schwitzer Str. 32          Tel. : (3641) 2809-55
D-07745 Jena                 Fax  : (3641) 2809-12

Besuchen Sie bitte unsere Web-Seiten: http://www.MAZeT.de
======================================================================