From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:33:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039901c88954$fecd1350$050514ac@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200803182104.58917.sr@denx.de
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>> >
>> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
>> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot
>> > custodian branches for those architectures. Fortunately we had some
>> > volunteers. Here the list:
>> >
>> > u-boot-at91 (Atmel ARM) Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>> > u-boot-pxa (XScale) Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>> > u-boot-s3c24xx (Samsung ARM) Harald Welte
>> >
>> > Again, thanks a lot to the (new) custodians. Your help is really
>> > appreciated.
>>
>> Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91
>> Product line
>
> Could be, I really don't know. I don't remember seeing Atmel ARM patches
> posted or reviewed by other Atmel than yourself.
They were sent in 3-4 years ago.
Since there were no response, they lost interest, and have not tried since then.
They are maintaining a separate U-Boot source package.
>
> So for the time being, we gladly accept that Jean-Christophe volunteered to
> take over this custodianship. From my point of view, he is doing a very good
> job with his other U-Boot activities. So I expect that the AT91 support could
> be handled better from now on.
Have no criticism against Jean-Christophe, but I think that support for
new chips may be available earlier with the AT91 team.
>
> But again, we are open for other suggestions here too. If you think someone at
> Atmel is better suited to do this job, then please let us know.
I will not have the time to maintain, that is for sure.
I think that the issue needs to be raised with the AT91 team, but it might be that
the AT91 team decides that they rather work closely with Jean-Christophe.
Andrew Victor is doing a good job maintaining the AT91 Linux port
so there is a precedent for this already.
>
> BTW: If somebody else feels suited to take over some open custodianships (PCI,
> RTC, HWMON come to my mind right now), please let us know too. :)
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-18 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-18 5:07 [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change Stefan Roese
2008-03-18 10:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-18 14:55 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-18 20:04 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-18 23:33 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2008-03-19 5:00 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-19 7:41 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-20 17:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-03-20 18:13 ` Stelian Pop
2008-03-21 10:38 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-25 23:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-20 17:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-03-26 10:14 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='039901c88954$fecd1350$050514ac@atmel.com' \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox