From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:00:54 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of CFG_MONITOR_BASE In-Reply-To: <20080422122821.4759532f.kim.phillips@freescale.com> References: <1207738602-23956-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <20080410194502.13d37051.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <20080421160506.86caca50.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <040601c8a43c$b2c86650$185932f0$@Tjernlund@transmode.se> <20080422122821.4759532f.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Message-ID: <04e101c8a507$64c782d0$2e568870$@Tjernlund@transmode.se> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phillips at freescale.com] > Sent: den 22 april 2008 19:28 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: 'Stefan Roese'; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of > CFG_MONITOR_BASE > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:49:57 +0200 > "Joakim Tjernlund" wrote: > > > > Currently WD's top of tree renders 83xx kaput. When I revert this > > > revert plus Joakim's original 70431e8 commit, things are back to > > > normal. I'm not going to pretend I know to fix it up correctly, so > > > does anyone have a problem with me sending two revert patches until > > > relocation is properly and comprehensively fixed? > > > > Strange, I got a 8321 and it worked for me. Maybe a toolchain issue? Perhaps > > I got something extra in my board port, dunno what though. > > > I just reconfirmed it using WD's TOT w/gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red > Hat 4.1.2-27). Got gcc 3.4.6 here, so I guess there is some difference between them(or perhaps ld). Can't help you, so do as you wish. Jocke