[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of CFG_MONITOR_BASE

Joakim Tjernlund
2008-04-23T06:00:54Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phillips at freescale.com]
> Sent: den 22 april 2008 19:28
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: 'Stefan Roese'; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of
> CFG_MONITOR_BASE
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:49:57 +0200
> "Joakim Tjernlund" <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote:
>
> > > Currently WD's top of tree renders 83xx kaput. When I revert this
> > > revert plus Joakim's original 70431e8 commit, things are back to
> > > normal. I'm not going to pretend I know to fix it up correctly, so
> > > does anyone have a problem with me sending two revert patches until
> > > relocation is properly and comprehensively fixed?
> >
> > Strange, I got a 8321 and it worked for me. Maybe a toolchain issue? Perhaps
> > I got something extra in my board port, dunno what though.
> >
> I just reconfirmed it using WD's TOT w/gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red
> Hat 4.1.2-27).

Got gcc 3.4.6 here, so I guess there is some difference between them(or perhaps
ld). Can't help you, so do as you wish.

Jocke