From: Roger Meier <roger@bufferoverflow.ch>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] libfdt: SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ BSD-2-Clause
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:59:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04e501ce8ba3$08496180$18dc2480$@bufferoverflow.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130727221309.E066F380448@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd at denx.de]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Juli 2013 00:13
> An: Roger Meier
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] libfdt: SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ BSD-2-Clause
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> In message <1374880358-7743-1-git-send-email-roger@bufferoverflow.ch>
> you wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Meier <roger@bufferoverflow.ch>
> > ---
> > Licenses/README | 13 ++++++------
> > Licenses/bsd-2-clause.txt | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/libfdt/fdt.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_empty_tree.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_sw.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/fdt_wip.c | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > lib/libfdt/libfdt_internal.h | 47 +-----------------------------------------
> > 10 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Licenses/bsd-2-clause.txt
>
> Thanks for pushing this forward.
>
> I have but one comment:
>
> > +BSD 2-Clause License BSD-2-Clause Y
> bsd-2-clause.txt https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-
> Clause
>
> I don;t really like picking up the original license text from a second
> source (SPDX here) - I'd rather refer to some "original" version
> published by the creator of the license.
>
> Maybe we can find a better URI here?
I agree, original version only we already have the SPDX Identifier.
It's a difficult task with BSD licenses and I found no original source yet.
Official information from Berkeley University:
http://ipira.berkeley.edu/
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
Other sources or information:
http://www.linfo.org/bsdlicense.html
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html
should I rebase without an URL for BSD-2-Clause as long as we have the
license in text form anyway?
>
>
> Except for that:
>
> Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Thanks!
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-28 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 23:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH] libfdt: SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ BSD-2-Clause Roger Meier
2013-07-27 13:41 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-27 22:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-07-27 22:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-07-28 14:59 ` Roger Meier [this message]
2013-07-28 15:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-08-19 19:37 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='04e501ce8ba3$08496180$18dc2480$@bufferoverflow.ch' \
--to=roger@bufferoverflow.ch \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox