From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:15:43 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash References: <1208027002.23686.7.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> <1208093818.23686.11.camel@voyager.dsnet> <02bf01c89df4$fe986380$040514ac@atmel.com> <1208164773.6399.34.camel@galileo> Message-ID: <07e001c89e24$620c3e80$dfb5fea9@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Le lundi 14 avril 2008 ? 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit : >> > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit : >> >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes >> > >> > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the >> > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9 >> > boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > Stelian Pop >> > >> >> >> It is mainly time related. >> This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK. >> The standard CFI driver is not. >> While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test. > > Linux seems to use the CFI driver, just like every other SAM/CAP board, > so it should be safe to switch to the standard CFI driver. > > The only remaining issue is testing, and I was hoping you could do this > as part of the new board porting. :) > This is not "porting of a new board". This board support has existed for 3-4 years in the Atmel U-Boot. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson