From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
U-Boot STM32 <uboot-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] stm32mp: add minimal RCC support for STM32MP13
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 09:42:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c7bf009-9731-d16b-ce8d-08718e6dd7bb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21688d64-ffeb-d0b7-b6e5-2efeb3f33ec1@foss.st.com>
Hi Patrick,
On 5/17/22 4:12 AM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/11/22 18:44, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> On 5/10/22 3:51 AM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a minimal support for STM32MP13 RCC, the reset and clock controller
>>> - update of the RCC MISC driver to bind the correct clock and reset driver
>>> - reset driver, same than STM32MP15x = drivers/reset/stm32-reset.c
>>> - clock driver, add a empty driver for STM32MP13x =
>>> drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c
>>> - Add RCC node in SOC device tree with u-boot,dm-pre-reloc property
>>>
>>> This serie is only a preliminary step for STM32MP13 clock and reset support
>>> in U-Boot, based on Linux kernel binding introduced by [1] and it prepares
>>> the next device tree alignment with Linux kernel.
>>>
>>> The functional STMP13 clock driver based on CCF and on SCMI clocks
>>> provided by OP-TEE and the clock and reset references in SOC device tree
>>> will be pushed when the associated patches in [1] will be accepted.
>>>
>>> [1] Introduction of STM32MP13 RCC driver (Reset Clock Controller)
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220316131000.9874-1-gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com/
>>
>> I'm not really sure what the purpose of this series is. Can you
>> elaborate a bit on why we need a dummy clock driver? Why don't
>> you just add the binding to the device tree without the associated
>> driver?
>
>
> After this serie, the RCC reset part is functional on STM32MP13 (probe and ops)
>
> even if the associated binding is not present in device tree.
>
> tested with:
>
> ------------------------- arch/arm/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi -------------------------
> index fcb0af09b5..d9c6185bcf 100644
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@
> interrupt-names = "cmd_irq";
> clocks = <&clk_pll4_p>;
> clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> + resets = <&rcc 14224>;
> cap-sd-highspeed;
> cap-mmc-highspeed;
> max-frequency = <130000000>;
>
>
> A dummy STM32MP13 clock driver is requested to allow RCC MISC and RCC RESET
>
> binding and probe without issue.
Shouldn't the solution be to make the clock optional in the user?
> This reset support was requested by SDMCC driver and SD-Card boot, before the patch:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220506160540.13.I39b69e8dc7b43b8e265e77388fb53f7c1fa2a007@changeid/
>
>
> As we solve the SDMCC dependency issue (reset become optionnal), so this serie is no more mandatory.
>
>
> This serie is a just a cleanup / preliminary step, but I can drop this dummy RCC driver if it is disturbing.
I would like that, since this is not mandatory.
--Sean
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 7:51 [PATCH 0/4] stm32mp: add minimal RCC support for STM32MP13 Patrick Delaunay
2022-05-10 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: Add directory for STM32 clock drivers Patrick Delaunay
2022-05-11 16:40 ` Sean Anderson
2022-05-10 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: stm32mp13: add a STM32MP13 RCC clock driver Patrick Delaunay
2022-05-10 12:18 ` [Uboot-stm32] " Grzegorz Szymaszek
2022-05-10 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] misc: stm32mp13: introduce STM32MP13 RCC driver Patrick Delaunay
2022-05-10 7:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add rcc node for STM32MP13 Patrick Delaunay
2022-05-11 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/4] stm32mp: add minimal RCC support " Sean Anderson
2022-05-17 8:12 ` Patrick DELAUNAY
2022-05-19 13:42 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c7bf009-9731-d16b-ce8d-08718e6dd7bb@gmail.com \
--to=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=uboot-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox