From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Pell <chri@infis.univ.trieste.it>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:13:47 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111
In-Reply-To: <20050126145852.73171.qmail@web53608.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050126145852.73171.qmail@web53608.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1106756028.5589.52.camel@absolute.ascensit.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:58 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> 
> But in u-boot I got the two options:
> 
> So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 
> 
> As per grep output and reading the source code I think
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.
> 
> 

Hi, beware the 2 controllers are different. If you don't read the
register map carefully you miss important points like that the chunk for
allocating buffer is 256 in the former chip and 1024 in the later.
Anyway if there are 2 different drivers there is obviously a reason so
go for the SMC91111. :-)

Bye,