From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Schlote <schlote@vahanus.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:11:46 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot refactoring
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40707031148x4e5508ebgac2268741ee98b2e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fa686aa40707031148x4e5508ebgac2268741ee98b2e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1183576307.3393.38.camel@loki>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Grant,

> each invasive change.  Thoughts?  I also think that Jon's CONFIG_
> changes should probably be merged first, and as soon as possible.

Yes, these CFG_ defines are real show blockers. Getting rid of them in
all board headers could really simplify the integration of kconfig.

CFG_ defines can be everywhere else in the source, as long as they are
non defined or changed by a user. 

With all user-configurable defines starting with CONFIG_ we can start
with the rest :-)

Regards
  Carsten