From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Schlote <schlote@vahanus.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 01:53:23 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot refactoring
In-Reply-To: <1183661913.26273.49.camel@ld0161-tx32>
References: <fa686aa40707031148x4e5508ebgac2268741ee98b2e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1183576307.3393.38.camel@loki> <1183661913.26273.49.camel@ld0161-tx32>
Message-ID: <1183679603.3232.1.camel@loki>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 13:58 -0500 schrieb Jon Loeliger:
> > With all user-configurable defines starting with CONFIG_ we can start
> > with the rest :-)
> 
> 
> Say....  Not to put _too_ fine a spin on this, but there
> is a _veeery_ similar issue brewing with the POST CFG_ symbols...

For my kconfig hack in the 1.x tree I to rework both the CONFIG_POST and
CONFIG_COMMAND stuff. Can be solved easily.

Carsten