From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:46:45 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/RFC] mpc5200: switch to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
In-Reply-To: <46DD520C.7010007@smiths-aerospace.com>
References: <20070830173340.24697.19740.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net>
	<20070903203655.GA16323@frozen.semihalf.com>
	<fa686aa40709031447g202c4384ne8484c32c01b7262@mail.gmail.com>
	<46DC83AD.6090507@gmail.com>
	<fa686aa40709031509q2a9b90b7tfe20756ebc333879@mail.gmail.com>
	<46DC8D58.7060000@gmail.com>
	<fa686aa40709031555o6a90c7f7t321cb4bc21607923@mail.gmail.com>
	<46DCA439.9080506@gmail.com>
	<fa686aa40709032009h3e4307b0x3a974f0711ae461f@mail.gmail.com>
	<46DD520C.7010007@smiths-aerospace.com>
Message-ID: <1188917205.624.3.camel@ld0161-tx32>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:39, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

> Ahh, now I see what you were asking.  When I ported libfdt to u-boot, I 
> ended up forking it 

 ...

> To unfork, we have a couple of issues to work out.  One is the amount of 
> effort to undo the divergence (probably not bad).  The other is the 
> dual-licensing issue:

 ...

>  In order to 
> unfork, we would have to have agreement from the authors of the 
> additional code to relicense with the dual license... or maybe Jon and 
> David have independently written equivalent routines (quite possible).

Right.

Jon has recently been busy staring into Cardiac ICUs, getting
a split tooth repaired, and breaking his big toe.  No actual
coding is taking place, unfortunately. :-)

jdl


PS -- All I need now is someone to staring using "u" instead of "you"
    to set me off...