From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kenneth johansson Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:53:38 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Changing u-boot relocation scheme In-Reply-To: References: <20080724130105.3EE93248B9@gemini.denx.de> <1216905458.27201.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080724185734.6d79c419@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com> <1216922981.27201.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1217058818.7972.77.camel@duo> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 01:48 -0400, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Kenneth Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:37 -0700, vb wrote: > >> But as you pointed out, this would work on ppc only (with a 'good' > >> compiler), and still remains to be proven, I will get to it a bit > >> later. > > > > I have run u-boot with everything compiled with -mrelocatable and normal > > relocation fixup code removed so I know it works fine. So consider it > > proven. But since it apparently is a problem in some situation the best > > is probably to make it a configuration option. > > Can you test against various versions of gcc? That is where I ran into trouble. Well If you have a specific version you know is not working I could test that.