From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kenneth Johansson Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:13:49 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ads5121: Set offset of NFC registers in device tree. In-Reply-To: <20080903204132.25749248A0@gemini.denx.de> References: <1220391700-2155-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <4b73d43f0809030759g123d5146lc9eb5348799b1838@mail.gmail.com> <20080903204132.25749248A0@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <1220516029.31338.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 22:41 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "John Rigby", > > In message <4b73d43f0809030759g123d5146lc9eb5348799b1838@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I'm not sure this right way to deal with this. Even with the modified > > offset the 1.5 silicon linux nand driver will not work correctly with > > the 2.0 silicon nand controller. > > That's right - but al least the Linux kernel will not crash if used on > one or the other board. yes but due to the large difference you will probably never se one driver supporting both version so just changing the name of the hardware node is probably easier. > I think we should fix the NFC base address on the device tree level - > having to support different Linux kernel configurations depending on > if you are on old or new hardware is pretty painful. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk >