From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kenneth johansson <kenneth@southpole.se>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:04:28 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] make make quiet
In-Reply-To: <200812310615.42259.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1230636057.17914.5.camel@duo>
	<200812310446.19804.vapier@gentoo.org> <1230718011.19628.24.camel@duo>
	<200812310615.42259.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <1230725068.19628.53.camel@duo>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 06:15 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 2008 05:06:51 kenneth johansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i.e. drop all of the $(AR) calls in board/*/Makefile and replace it with
> > > a toplevel pattern kind of like:
> > > %.a: %.o
> > > 	$(AR) $(ARFLAGS) $^ -o $@
> >
> > sure but that would be a separate changeset. I was trying to keep the
> > change as small as possible.
> 
> those two statements dont make sense together ... if you unify the boards 
> first, then the resulting "quiet" patch is a lot smaller.
> -mike

 :) I did not mean the size of the patch I meant the impact of the
change how easy it is to follow what has happened.

But if you do a rule for the library consolidation that works I'm happy
to rebase my changes on top of that. I'm not going to do the lib stuff
myself though.