From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/11] 8xxx: Rename dma_xfer() to dmacpy()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:25:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242937537.26746.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521174602.GA4218@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net>
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:46 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:10:06PM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
> > -int dma_xfer(void *dest, uint count, void *src) {
> > +int dmacpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) {
>
> While we're changing this, perhaps it should take phys_addr_t rather than
> pointers?
It looks like addresses > 32bits can be used by using a few bits in the
SATR/DATR so you're right, using phys_addr_t/phys_size_t makes sense.
Thanks,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-21 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 17:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] 85xx/86xx dma updates Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fsl: Create common fsl_dma.h for 85xx and 86xx cpus Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 22:21 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/11] 85xx, 86xx: Sync up DMA code Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 22:21 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/11] 85xx, 86xx: Break out DMA code to a common file Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 14:37 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/11] fsl_dma: Add bitfield definitions for common registers Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/11] fsl_dma: Update to use proper I/O accessor functions Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] fsl_dma: Add support for arbitrarily large transfers Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/11] fsl_dma: Fix Channel Start bug in dma_check() Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/11] 8xxx: Rename dma_xfer() to dmacpy() Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:46 ` Scott Wood
2009-05-21 20:25 ` Peter Tyser [this message]
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 14:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-22 23:12 ` Peter Tyser
2009-06-30 13:20 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-30 13:24 ` Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/11] 85xx, 86xx: Move dma_init() call to common code Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11] fsl_dma: Break out common memory initialization function Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 19:37 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] 85xx/86xx dma updates Ira Snyder
2009-05-21 20:49 ` Peter Tyser
2009-05-22 7:29 ` Ira Snyder
2009-05-27 3:40 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242937537.26746.39.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox