From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ajay Bhargav Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:42:59 +0530 (IST) Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] net: Adds Fast Ethernet Controller driver for Armada100 In-Reply-To: <201108251419.41030.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1244952847.3268.1314274379412.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de ----- "Marek Vasut" wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2011 01:07:32 PM Ajay Bhargav wrote: > > ----- "Marek Vasut" wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > +static void abortdma(struct eth_device *dev) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct armdfec_device *darmdfec = to_darmdfec(dev); > > > > + struct armdfec_reg *regs = darmdfec->regs; > > > > + int delay; > > > > + int maxretries = 40; > > > > + > > > > + do { > > > > + writel(SDMA_CMD_AR | SDMA_CMD_AT, ®s->sdma_cmd); > > > > + udelay(100); > > > > + > > > > + delay = 10; > > > > + while ((readl(®s->sdma_cmd) & > > > > + (SDMA_CMD_AR | SDMA_CMD_AT)) > > > > + && delay-- > 0) { > > > > + udelay(10); > > > > + } > > > > + } while (maxretries-- > 0 && delay <= 0); > > > > > > Didn't I comment on this one in V1? > > > > I modified it as follows... Is it more readable now? :) > > > > while (maxretries--) { > > writel(SDMA_CMD_AR | SDMA_CMD_AT, ®s->sdma_cmd); > > udelay(100); > > > > delay = 10; > > while ((readl(®s->sdma_cmd) & (SDMA_CMD_AR | SDMA_CMD_AT)) > > && delay--) > > udelay(10); > > if(delay) > > break; > > delay = 10; > while (--delay) { > tmp = readl(®s->sdma_cmd); > if (!(tmp & (SDMA_CMD_AR | SDMA_CMD_AT)) > break; > udelay(10); > } > if (delay) > break; > > It makes the code horizontally shorter. What do you think? Btw there's > a rule in > U-Boot that multi-line statements must have braces. > Thanks Marek, Yes it looks much better :) see the plus point on working with experts rather running away? :D Regards, Ajay Bhargav