From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:12:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245712368.5818.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82F81B7F-A4B1-4E1A-BA35-269A0D7C64AF@kernel.crashing.org>
Hi Kumar,
> > diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h
> > index c9ec6b5..06ecdcd 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h
> > @@ -94,4 +94,9 @@ typedef struct fsl_dma {
> > char res4[56];
> > } fsl_dma_t;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DMA
> > +void dma_init(void);
> > +int dmacpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> #ifdef protection here seems kinda pointless
Most boards won't have CONFIG_FSL_DMA defined, but this file will still
be used in the immap_86xx.h files for padding immap_t. I figured most
users won't have dma_init() or dmacpy() so the protection wouldn't hurt.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 17:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] 85xx/86xx dma updates Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fsl: Create common fsl_dma.h for 85xx and 86xx cpus Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 22:21 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/11] 85xx, 86xx: Sync up DMA code Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 22:21 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/11] 85xx, 86xx: Break out DMA code to a common file Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 14:37 ` Kumar Gala
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/11] fsl_dma: Add bitfield definitions for common registers Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/11] fsl_dma: Update to use proper I/O accessor functions Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] fsl_dma: Add support for arbitrarily large transfers Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/11] fsl_dma: Fix Channel Start bug in dma_check() Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/11] 8xxx: Rename dma_xfer() to dmacpy() Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:46 ` Scott Wood
2009-05-21 20:25 ` Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file Peter Tyser
2009-06-12 14:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-22 23:12 ` Peter Tyser [this message]
2009-06-30 13:20 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-30 13:24 ` Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/11] 85xx, 86xx: Move dma_init() call to common code Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 17:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11] fsl_dma: Break out common memory initialization function Peter Tyser
2009-05-21 19:37 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] 85xx/86xx dma updates Ira Snyder
2009-05-21 20:49 ` Peter Tyser
2009-05-22 7:29 ` Ira Snyder
2009-05-27 3:40 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245712368.5818.90.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox