From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initializeSDRAM
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:32:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247099546.19320.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D7CCA83BB0796C49BC0BB53B6AB120894BB5A0@zch01exm21.fsl.freescale.net>
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:24 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
> > When SDRAM ECC is enabled and CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER is not
> > defined use DMA to set SDRAM to a known state. Previously a
> > sequence of
> > 64-bit stores was used.
>
> IIRC, the DMA init SDRAM is slower than the 64bit stores.
> It is why I added these code here.
>
> I suggest to keep the way.
According to Ira, the DMA method was faster than the cpu method:
"It makes the DMA initialization normal speed again. The DMA in the for
loop takes the longest (as expected).
So yes, strangely it (enabling the icache) makes a HUGE difference. The
total time is <3 seconds now. It is now faster than the previous CPU
method."
Logically the DMA method should be faster, and Ira's results seem to
reinforce this. I don't have an 83xx board to test on, so let me know
if others have different results than Ira.
Best,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-09 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-09 0:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3 v2] DMA ECC update Peter Tyser
2009-07-09 0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initialize SDRAM Peter Tyser
2009-07-09 0:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initializeSDRAM Liu Dave-R63238
2009-07-09 0:32 ` Peter Tyser [this message]
2009-07-09 0:43 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-07-09 12:39 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-09 12:51 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-09 0:58 ` Ira W. Snyder
2009-07-09 15:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initialize SDRAM Ira W. Snyder
2009-07-09 17:00 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-14 9:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-14 14:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-07-14 14:42 ` Peter Tyser
2009-07-14 15:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-14 17:32 ` Kim Phillips
2009-07-14 18:37 ` Peter Tyser
2009-07-09 0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v2] 83xx: Add CONFIG_MEM_INIT_VALUE for boards with ECC Peter Tyser
2009-07-09 0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v2] fsl_dma: Fix SDRAM initial value Peter Tyser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247099546.19320.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox