public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initializeSDRAM
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:32:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247099546.19320.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D7CCA83BB0796C49BC0BB53B6AB120894BB5A0@zch01exm21.fsl.freescale.net>

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:24 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
> > When SDRAM ECC is enabled and CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER is not
> > defined use DMA to set SDRAM to a known state.  Previously a 
> > sequence of
> > 64-bit stores was used.
> 
> IIRC, the DMA init SDRAM is slower than the 64bit stores.
> It is why I added these code here.
> 
> I suggest to keep the way. 

According to Ira, the DMA method was faster than the cpu method:
"It makes the DMA initialization normal speed again. The DMA in the for
loop takes the longest (as expected).

So yes, strangely it (enabling the icache) makes a HUGE difference. The
total time is <3 seconds now. It is now faster than the previous CPU
method."


Logically the DMA method should be faster, and Ira's results seem to
reinforce this.  I don't have an 83xx board to test on, so let me know
if others have different results than Ira.

Best,
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-09  0:11 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3 v2] DMA ECC update Peter Tyser
2009-07-09  0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initialize SDRAM Peter Tyser
2009-07-09  0:24   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initializeSDRAM Liu Dave-R63238
2009-07-09  0:32     ` Peter Tyser [this message]
2009-07-09  0:43       ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-07-09 12:39         ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-09 12:51           ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-09  0:58       ` Ira W. Snyder
2009-07-09 15:58         ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] 83xx: Default to using DMA to initialize SDRAM Ira W. Snyder
2009-07-09 17:00           ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-07-14  9:22   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-14 14:41     ` Kumar Gala
2009-07-14 14:42     ` Peter Tyser
2009-07-14 15:21       ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-14 17:32       ` Kim Phillips
2009-07-14 18:37         ` Peter Tyser
2009-07-09  0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v2] 83xx: Add CONFIG_MEM_INIT_VALUE for boards with ECC Peter Tyser
2009-07-09  0:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v2] fsl_dma: Fix SDRAM initial value Peter Tyser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247099546.19320.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox