From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vibi sreenivasan <vibi_sreenivasan@cms.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:05:45 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] Why u-boot & linux uses different machineid
	for	at91rm9200dk
In-Reply-To: <20090812194431.9155C833DBD2@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1250062753.2419.8.camel@HunTEr>
	<20090812194431.9155C833DBD2@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <1250145346.2537.1.camel@HunTEr>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

hello Wolfgang Denk,
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:44 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear vibi sreenivasan,
> 
> In message <1250062753.2419.8.camel@HunTEr> you wrote:
> >
> > 	Why u-boot & linux uses different machine id for at91rm9200dk.
> 
> do they? well, which exact versions of U-Boot and Linux are you
> talking about?
> 
> > 	is seems that u-boot is using 0x000000FB & linux is using
> > 	0x00000106.
> > 
> > 	Can we fix this in u-boot itself ?
> 
> In U-Boot I see:
> 
> 	-> grep MACH_TYPE_AT91RM9200DK include/asm-arm/mach-types.h
> 	#define MACH_TYPE_AT91RM9200DK         262
> 	#  define machine_arch_type     MACH_TYPE_AT91RM9200DK
> 	# define machine_is_at91rm9200dk()      (machine_arch_type ==
> 	# MACH_TYPE_AT91RM9200DK)
> 
> 262 = 0x106.
> 
> This iseems to be what Linux uses, too, and what is officially
> registered.
> 
> Maybe you should update your code?
Thanks for your support, i was using an older version of u-boot.

Thanks & Regards
vibi sreenivasan
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
>