From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcel Ziswiler Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:51:06 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] mpc8260: move FDT memory node fixup into common CPU code. In-Reply-To: <20090908211930.1E493832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> References: <1252423922.5386.17.camel@com-21> <20090908182505.C7677832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <1252440603.5386.40.camel@com-21> <20090908204442.3064E832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> <1252443768.5386.82.camel@com-21> <20090908211930.1E493832E8DE@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <1252446666.5386.102.camel@com-21> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 23:19 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > No, on contrary. New versions of a patch should always make sure to > thread correctly to the old version(s). It seems that preferences here > are a matter of taste - my personal preference is to link to the > preceeding version of the patch, but most others seem to prefer to > link to the first version always. That's kind of what I thought at first as well, but then I saw many others posting patches not adhering to that and still getting your ack no problem: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67581 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67462 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67394 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67187