From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:36:41 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] examples/standalone: Remove relocation compile
 flags for PowerPC
In-Reply-To: <4C17CEEC.8000409@freescale.com>
References: <1276572325-12642-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com>
	<4C17CE2F.9050208@freescale.com>  <4C17CEEC.8000409@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <1276630601.32134.1501.camel@petert>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 14:05 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Peter Tyser wrote:
> >> Previously, standalone applications were compiled with gcc flags that 
> >> produced relocatable executables on the PowerPC architecture (eg with the
> >> -mrelocatable and -fPIC flags).  There's no reason for these applications
> >> to be fully relocatable at this time since no relocation fixups are
> >> performed on standalone applications.
> > 
> > This didn't work for me.  The entry point for my application in 401b4.
> 
> So if I comment-out the ifeq, like this:
> 
> #ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
> CFLAGS := $(filter-out $(RELFLAGS),$(CFLAGS))
> #endif

Was commenting out the 'ifeq' above necessary?  It shouldn't be, so my
first question would be why it was needed.

Best,
Peter