[U-Boot] Too Much Email

[U-Boot] Too Much Email

[Moran, Jack]

How can I go about configuring u-boot email to only send emails that
pertain to a response to my question?

Thanks
Jack

John  M Moran 
General Dynamics C4S 
77 "A" St. 
Needham, MA, 02494 
Phone: 781-455-4071 
Email: jack.moran at gdc4s.com 

[U-Boot] Too Much Email

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear "Moran, Jack",

In message <3DFFB0670A395946974CE996C72073241BF283C5@NDHMC4SXCH.gdc4s.com> you wrote:
>
> How can I go about configuring u-boot email to only send emails that
> pertain to a response to my question?

You cannot. This is a mailing list.

If you don;t want to receive thelist messages, you can always
unsubscribe.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
There are two ways to write error-free programs. Only the  third  one
works.

[U-Boot] Too Much Email

[Michelle Konzack]

Hello Moran, Jack,

Am 2010-07-18 09:08:05, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> How can I go about configuring u-boot email to only send emails that
> pertain to a response to my question?

You can't.

But maybe you setup a local filter (procmail, maildrop, sieve, ...)
and filter <u-boot> messages to a seperated folder?

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack

-- 
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux

itsystems at tdnet France EURL       itsystems at tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack            Owner Michelle Konzack

Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz                 Kinzigstra?e 17
67100 Strasbourg/France           77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil         Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix

<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>  <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/>         <http://www.can4linux.org/>

Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de
ICQ    #328449886

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100718/254f430d/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Too Much Email

["Xiangfu Liu(刘向富)"]

Hi Moran.

create one message filter in your email client. :)

On 07/18/2010 09:08 PM, Moran, Jack wrote:
> How can I go about configuring u-boot email to only send emails that
> pertain to a response to my question?
>
> Thanks
> Jack
>
> John  M Moran
> General Dynamics C4S
> 77 "A" St.
> Needham, MA, 02494
> Phone: 781-455-4071
> Email: jack.moran at gdc4s.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


-- 
Best Regards
Xiangfu Liu
http://www.openmobilefree.net

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Li Haibo]

get_timer_masked() should return current timestamp,
not current ticks from hardware register.

Tested on one custom board with NAND flash.
Without this patch, NAND write always TIMEOUT
because get_timer(0) return a big value.

This patch applies for u-boot-2010.06

Signed-off-by: Li Haibo <hbli@sinocastel.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
index 81c4a06..110edbf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ ulong get_timer_masked(void)
 		timestamp += ((0xFFFFFFFF / (CONFIG_MX51_CLK32 / CONFIG_SYS_HZ))
 				- lastinc) + val;
 	lastinc = val;
-	return val;
+	return timestamp;
 }
 
 ulong get_timer(ulong base)
-- 
1.6.5.2


-- 
???
??????
???????????????
???????????2???????5?5????
Tel?+86-755-86185111-3667
Email?hbli at sinocastel.com
Website?www.sinocastel.com 

????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
Shenzhen CASTEL Wireless Telecommunications Co., Ltd.,
Which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of theinformation contained herein in any way (Including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the Intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Stefano,

In message <1279714212.2643.32.camel@localhost> Li Haibo wrote:
> get_timer_masked() should return current timestamp,
> not current ticks from hardware register.
> 
> Tested on one custom board with NAND flash.
> Without this patch, NAND write always TIMEOUT
> because get_timer(0) return a big value.
> 
> This patch applies for u-boot-2010.06
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Haibo <hbli@sinocastel.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
Thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer you will
find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it  on
the computer.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Stefano Babic]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stefano,
> 

Hi Wolfgang,

> Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
> Thanks.

Thanks, I missed it. I would change the name of the maintainer and I
will set myself for the MX51EVK, because Fred Fan resigned as maintainer
for this board.

Li, could you please resend your patch as text ? It was sent as base-64
encoded, and I cannot directly apply it.

Thanks,
Stefano Babic


-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Li Haibo]

> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Stefano,
> > 
> 
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> > Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
> > Thanks.
> 
> Thanks, I missed it. I would change the name of the maintainer and I
> will set myself for the MX51EVK, because Fred Fan resigned as maintainer
> for this board.
> 
> Li, could you please resend your patch as text ? It was sent as base-64
> encoded, and I cannot directly apply it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano Babic
> 
> 
get_timer_masked() should return current timestamp,
not current ticks from hardware register.

Tested on one custom board with NAND flash.
Without this patch, NAND write always TIMEOUT
because get_timer(0) return a big value.

This patch applies for u-boot-2010.06

Signed-off-by: Li Haibo <hbli@sinocastel.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
index 81c4a06..110edbf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ ulong get_timer_masked(void)
 		timestamp += ((0xFFFFFFFF / (CONFIG_MX51_CLK32 / CONFIG_SYS_HZ))
 				- lastinc) + val;
 	lastinc = val;
-	return val;
+	return timestamp;
 }
 
 ulong get_timer(ulong base)
-- 
1.6.5.2



-- 
Li HaiBo
Tel?+86-755-86185111-3667
Email?hbli at sinocastel.com
Website?www.sinocastel.com 

This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
Shenzhen CASTEL Wireless Telecommunications Co., Ltd.,
Which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of theinformation contained herein in any way (Including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the Intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Li Haibo]

> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Stefano,
> > 
> 
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> > Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
> > Thanks.
> 
> Thanks, I missed it. I would change the name of the maintainer and I
> will set myself for the MX51EVK, because Fred Fan resigned as maintainer
> for this board.
> 
> Li, could you please resend your patch as text ? It was sent as base-64
> encoded, and I cannot directly apply it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano Babic
> 
> 
get_timer_masked() should return current timestamp,
not current ticks from hardware register.

Tested on one custom board with NAND flash.
Without this patch, NAND write always TIMEOUT
because get_timer(0) return a big value.

This patch applies for u-boot-2010.06

Signed-off-by: Li Haibo <hbli@sinocastel.com>

---
 arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
index 81c4a06..110edbf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/timer.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ ulong get_timer_masked(void)
 		timestamp += ((0xFFFFFFFF / (CONFIG_MX51_CLK32 / CONFIG_SYS_HZ))
 				- lastinc) + val;
 	lastinc = val;
-	return val;
+	return timestamp;
 }
 
 ulong get_timer(ulong base)
-- 
1.6.5.2



-- 
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
Shenzhen CASTEL Wireless Telecommunications Co., Ltd.,
Which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of theinformation contained herein in any way (Including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the Intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Xiangfu Liu]

Hi Haibo Li

I am try to help on test patch.  :)
you should not include the reply in your patch. those reply
message will goto git commit message which is not needed.

On 08/10/2010 10:57 AM, Li Haibo wrote:
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Stefano,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>>> Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Thanks, I missed it. I would change the name of the maintainer and I
>> will set myself for the MX51EVK, because Fred Fan resigned as maintainer
>> for this board.
>>
>> Li, could you please resend your patch as text ? It was sent as base-64
>> encoded, and I cannot directly apply it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano Babic
>>

-- 
Best Regards
Xiangfu Liu
http://www.openmobilefree.net

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Li Haibo]

> Hi Haibo Li
> 
> I am try to help on test patch.  :)
> you should not include the reply in your patch. those reply
> message will goto git commit message which is not needed.
> 
> On 08/10/2010 10:57 AM, Li Haibo wrote:
> >> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>> Dear Stefano,
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Wolfgang,
> >>
> >>> Can you please have a look at this, and eventually send a pull req?
> >>> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Thanks, I missed it. I would change the name of the maintainer and I
> >> will set myself for the MX51EVK, because Fred Fan resigned as maintainer
> >> for this board.
> >>
> >> Li, could you please resend your patch as text ? It was sent as base-64
> >> encoded, and I cannot directly apply it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stefano Babic
> >>
> 
Hi Liu:
Thanks for you help, but I need more :)
I'm newbie to such maillist. I post this small patch to check
if everything is OK, but... 

There are something I want know:
1. Does "base-64 encoded" problem still exist in this message?
2. Should I follow this thread, or resend a new one?

-- 
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
Shenzhen CASTEL Wireless Telecommunications Co., Ltd.,
Which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of theinformation contained herein in any way (Including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the Intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51EVK: fix return value of get_timer_masked

[Xiangfu Liu]

Hi

> Hi Liu:
> Thanks for you help, but I need more :)
> I'm newbie to such maillist. I post this small patch to check
> if everything is OK, but...
>
> There are something I want know:
> 1. Does "base-64 encoded" problem still exist in this message?

the last two emails you send are same.
first one is "base-64 encoded"
second is good.

> 2. Should I follow this thread, or resend a new one?
>

I think send a new one title with "[PATCH] v2".
you should use "git send-email" to send patch emails.

-- 
Best Regards
Xiangfu Liu
http://www.openmobilefree.net