From: Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] gpio: Adds GPIO driver support for Armada100
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:50:25 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281824279.36304.1311164425547.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZhoSSvPgMR0K7Mp2bQCBDn3R72ejE7y2KVmLqFe4fEEV4yXQ@mail.gmail.com>
----- "Lei Wen" <adrian.wenl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Ajay Bhargav
> <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com> wrote:
> > Hi Lei,
> >
> >> I think we make thing complicated here. For GPIO driver, the only
> >> structure we need to
> >> define is the GPIO register itself, like GPIO_PLR, GPIO_PDR,
> etc...
> >>
> >
> > I got your point, but lemme show you where the problem is..
> > GPIO_PLR0 ? ?0x0000
> > GPIO_PLR1 ? ?0x0004
> > GPIO_PLR2 ? ?0x0008
> > GPIO_PLR3 ? ?0x0100
> >
> > till 3 registers its fine... fourth register is way out of league.
> >
>
> I know this is a bit tricky, but couldn't be included in a logic
> hidden by MACRO or funcion?
>
> Best regards,
> Lei
>
Hi Lei,
I am rewriting the whole logic. Will submit the patch soon :)
I will use function to get base address.
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <814164661.33093.1311137863843.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-07-20 5:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] gpio: Adds GPIO driver support for Armada100 Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 6:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-20 6:36 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 10:08 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-20 10:43 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 12:18 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-20 12:20 ` Ajay Bhargav [this message]
2011-07-20 12:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-20 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] <1287709675.34262.1311146613076.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-07-20 7:29 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 7:48 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-20 7:54 ` Ajay Bhargav
[not found] <952685375.34177.1311145646630.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-07-20 7:14 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 7:28 ` Lei Wen
[not found] <550445252.29883.1311070783386.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-07-19 10:29 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-19 17:36 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2011-07-20 7:13 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-18 9:41 Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-18 17:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-18 19:01 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2011-07-19 4:04 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-19 4:01 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-19 4:14 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-19 4:14 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-20 3:49 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2011-07-19 5:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-07-19 5:55 ` Lei Wen
2011-07-19 4:23 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-07-19 17:36 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2011-07-20 7:11 ` Lei Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281824279.36304.1311164425547.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com \
--to=ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox