public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends.
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:31:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292679093-4632-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> (raw)

gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.

Reading C99 6.7.3 8 and the comment 114) there, I think it is a bug of that
gcc version to ignore the volatile type qualifier used e.g. in __arch_getl().
Anyway, using a definition as in the kernel headers avoids such optimizations when
gcc 4.5.1 is used.

Maybe the headers as used in the current linux-kernel should be used,
but to avoid large changes, I've just added a small change to the current headers.

I haven't add the definitions which are using a memory barrier because I haven't found
a place in the kernel where they were actually enabled (CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE).

Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/io.h |   15 +++++++++------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
index ff1518e..3b6c1da 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
@@ -125,13 +125,16 @@ extern inline void __raw_readsl(unsigned int addr, void *data, int longlen)
 #define __raw_readw(a)			__arch_getw(a)
 #define __raw_readl(a)			__arch_getl(a)
 
-#define writeb(v,a)			__arch_putb(v,a)
-#define writew(v,a)			__arch_putw(v,a)
-#define writel(v,a)			__arch_putl(v,a)
+#define __iormb()		do { } while (0)
+#define __iowmb()		do { } while (0)
 
-#define readb(a)			__arch_getb(a)
-#define readw(a)			__arch_getw(a)
-#define readl(a)			__arch_getl(a)
+#define writeb(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putb(v,c); })
+#define writew(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putw(v,c); })
+#define writel(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putl(v,c); })
+
+#define readb(c)		({ u8  __v = __arch_getb(c); __iormb(); __v; })
+#define readw(c)		({ u16 __v = __arch_getw(c); __iormb(); __v; })
+#define readl(c)		({ u32 __v = __arch_getl(c); __iormb(); __v; })
 
 /*
  * The compiler seems to be incapable of optimising constants
-- 
1.7.2.2

             reply	other threads:[~2010-12-18 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-18 13:31 Alexander Holler [this message]
2010-12-18 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292679093-4632-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox