From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/9] make the hwconfig buffer deeper
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:08:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294085287.24386.52.camel@oslab-l1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101218222535.58FF31524E8@gemini.denx.de>
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 16:25 -0600, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1292630381-23022-2-git-send-email-yorksun@freescale.com> you wrote:
> > To temporarily fix buffer issue when running at flash, use bigger buffer
> > to push down the stack deeper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>
> Please explain 1) why this is needed and 2) what it has to do with
> running "at" (from?) flash?
>
> hwconfig is intended for simple h/w configurations. In which case do
> you need more than 128 characters for such settings? And is this
> really needed / reasonable?
First of all, I don't need more than 128 characters for hwconfig. I
think the buggy code makes the buffer less usable.
If you look into the common/hwconfig.c, you will notice the _current_
code uses the stack as temporary memory to hold the variable. Even I
don't agree with this way, I don't have a quick fix either. There may be
two ways or more to fix it. One is to create wrapper functions to deal
with pre-relocation and post-relocation functions. Another way is to
allocate more space in gd. Which way do you think is better?
York
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 23:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] mpc8xxx: Display RDIMM if detected York Sun
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/9] make the hwconfig buffer deeper York Sun
2010-12-18 22:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-03 20:08 ` York Sun [this message]
2011-01-03 21:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-03 21:26 ` York Sun
2011-01-03 21:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-07 15:14 ` Kumar Gala
2011-01-07 16:49 ` York Sun
2011-01-07 17:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-07 23:23 ` Kumar Gala
2011-01-09 21:00 ` Kumar Gala
2011-01-10 18:39 ` York Sun
2011-01-07 17:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/9] mpc8xxx: Enable ECC on/off control in hwconfig York Sun
2011-01-09 21:23 ` Kumar Gala
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] corenet_ds: Enable ECC for corenet_ds York Sun
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] mpc85xx: Adding more registers and options York Sun
2010-12-18 22:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/9] mpc85xx: Enable unique mode registers and dynamic ODT for DDR3 York Sun
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] Adding more SPD registers York Sun
2010-12-18 22:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/9] mpc85xx: Implement workaround for erratum DDR-A003 York Sun
2011-01-09 21:23 ` Kumar Gala
2010-12-17 23:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 9/9] corenet_ds: Extend board specific parameters York Sun
2010-12-18 22:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-18 22:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] mpc8xxx: Display RDIMM if detected Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-21 13:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294085287.24386.52.camel@oslab-l1 \
--to=yorksun@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox