From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:31:55 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] mpc83xx: add config options to spd_sdram
In-Reply-To: <4D9EBC3F.6040203@matrix-vision.de>
References: <4D9AE5BD.704@matrix-vision.de>
	<20110405165227.78ecd5bd.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
	<4D9C21EA.3070005@matrix-vision.de> <1302107849.4586.14.camel@oslab-l1>
	<908840060.379.1302115339879.JavaMail.open-xchange@proteus>
	<1427125824.654.1302208977309.JavaMail.open-xchange@proteus>
	<1302209771.19969.7.camel@oslab-l1> <4D9EBC3F.6040203@matrix-vision.de>
Message-ID: <1302276715.7417.5.camel@oslab-l1>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> > I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of
> > mpc85xx.
> ok - no "new" code for 83xx then.
> > You are right the old code is in spd_sdram.c and it is still in use for
> > mpc83xx. Unless to adjust the code, there is no board specific file.
> >
> Are you willing to accept some changes to spd_sdram.c or will I have 
> another out-of-tree board  ?
> 
> What we need is :
> 
> - more configurable settings like driver strength, cpo and odt values.
> - Reading SPD data from an arbitrary i2c eeprom.
> 
> What's so bad about my proposal ?
> Please let me know so that I'm able to improve.
> 

I welcome the change to use the new code since the feature you asked is
already there.

York