From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:00:15 +0000
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V3] AT91: Makes AT91SAM9RL SoC build
 correctly against u-boot-atmel/master
In-Reply-To: <1308107471-22295-1-git-send-email-hong.xu@atmel.com>
References: <1308107471-22295-1-git-send-email-hong.xu@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <1312185615.3635.105.camel@ubuntu>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Hong Xu,
> Rework for AT91SAM9RL SoC, makes it build again.
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9rl_matrix.h |  121 +++++---------

When I compare at91sam9rl_matrix.h to at91sam9260_matrix.h there is only
one subtle difference:

at91sam9260_matrix.h:

struct at91_matrix {
	u32	mcfg[16];	/* Master Configuration Registers */
	u32	scfg[16];	/* Slave Configuration Registers */
	u32	pras[16][2];	/* Priority Assignment Slave Registers */
	u32	mrcr;		/* Master Remap Control Register */
	u32	filler[0x06];
	u32	ebicsa;		/* EBI Chip Select Assignment Register */

at91sam9rl_matrix.h:

struct at91_matrix {
	u32	mcfg[16];	/* Master Configuration Registers */
	u32	scfg[16];	/* Slave Configuration Registers */
	u32	pras[16][2];	/* Priority Assignment Slave Registers */
	u32	mrcr;		/* Master Remap Control Register */
	u32	filler[7];
	u32	ebicsa;		/* EBI Chip Select Assignment Register */
};

1. Is it really filler[7] for the 9rl - can you verify with the data
sheet?
2. It seems there is a possibility to unify all those _matrix files into
one in the future (we are not going to do this now!) ?

Best Regards,
Reinhard