[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: reworked support for meesc board

[Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>]

Dear Matthias Fuchs,
> The meesc board support was broken. Within this opportunity, I completely
> reworked the board files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski <Daniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <Matthias.Fuchs@esd.eu>
> ---
> V3: -fix white space issues and don't patch boards.cfg
> V2: -fixed commit description
> 
>  board/esd/meesc/config.mk |    1 -
>  board/esd/meesc/meesc.c   |   49 ++++++-----
>  include/configs/meesc.h   |  208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  3 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 board/esd/meesc/config.mk

Sorry, this patch had escaped my sight.
Checkpatch has the following issues:

WARNING: Use #include <linux/io.h> instead of <asm/io.h>
#53: FILE: board/esd/meesc/meesc.c:30:
+#include <asm/io.h>
--> ignored

WARNING: please, no space for starting a line, 
				excluding comments
#334: FILE: include/configs/meesc.h:134:
+ /* DataFlash */$
--> fixed before applying

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
#369: FILE: include/configs/meesc.h:157:
+# define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ENABLE_PIN		AT91_PIO_PORTD, 15
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
#370: FILE: include/configs/meesc.h:158:
+# define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READY_PIN		AT91_PIO_PORTA, 22
--> both not nice style, but understandable als long as gpio routines
have 2 parameters (port and bit).

Configuring for meesc - Board: meesc, Options:
AT91SAM9263,SYS_USE_NANDFLASH
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 201434	   5304	  74688	 281426	  44b52	./u-boot

Configuring for meesc_dataflash - Board: meesc, Options:
AT91SAM9263,SYS_USE_DATAFLASH
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 207303	   5472	  75096	 287871	  4647f	./u-boot

"[U-Boot,41/52] ARM: remove broken "meesc" board" set to "not
applicable"

Thanks, Reinhard