[U-Boot] [PATCH 08/08] include/configs: Better utilize CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH

Tom Rini
2012-04-16T23:52:13Z

On 04/16/2012 01:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message<4F8C3615.9040401@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> I actually tend to believe it is a bad idea to have the #ifdef for
>>> CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH in<config_cmd_default.h>
>>
>> And perhaps we should drop IMLS/FLASH from config_cmd_default these days?
>
> No. Rather I'd like to see "imls" extended to support NAND as well
> :-)

To be a little serious, with NAND shouldn't one be using ubifs/ubiload?

--
Tom