[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link

Daniel Stodden
2012-05-09T08:00:30Z

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 11:02 +0200, DrEagle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 08/05/2012 01:40, Daniel Stodden a ?crit :
> > On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 12:53 -0500, David Purdy wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Luka Perkov <uboot@lukaperkov.net> wrote:
> >>> The kwboot program boots boards based on Marvell's Kirkwood platform
> >>> via Xmodem over their integrated UART.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@googlemail.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Luka Perkov <uboot@lukaperkov.net>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes from version v1:
> >>> * fix man page
> >>> * minor cosmetic fixes in tools/kwboot.c
> >>>
> >>> I changed things pointed out on v1 of this patch which was originally
> >>> made by Daniel.
> >>>
> >>
> >> @ Daniel, Luka, Prafulla, etal :
> >>
> >> I've tried kwboot on two of my devices, and as I was expecting:
> >>
> >> - it worked perfectly with the v1.21 BootROM device (a Seagate GoFlex
> >> Net) : Nicely done, well implemented, and the "timing" seems to be a
> >> non-issue w/ kwboot. Other previous applications for UARTbooting have
> >> seemed to me to be less reliable - only booting 50% or 75% of the
> >> time. I tried it with kwboot a dozen times or more and it was
> >> successful each time, The -p patch-for-UART-booting option is a nice
> >> feature.
> >>
> >>
> >> - it did not seem to work w/ v1.11 BootROM devices (a Pogoplug
> >> V2/E02, Seagate Dockstar) {previous utilities/picocom-hacks showed the
> >> same behavior - the bootROM version 1.11 apparently has some
> >> difference/defect/shortcoming that does not allow this function to
> >> work as the docs suggest it should. Too bad no one has pointed out
> >> exactly what the issue is, or found a patch/workaround it make this
> >> work on v1.11 BootROM devices.}. NOTE: It did _not_ adversely
> >> affect the device otherwise. I'd seen a post on a thread at another
> >> site that suggested that performing this procedure on a v1.11 device
> >> could corrupt the NAND - this was __not__ the case w/ my attempts
> >> (about a dozen trials, with UART uboot.kwb's and also using the -p
> >> patch option w/ NAND files.
> >
> > Hey.
> >
> > Unfortunately I only have a couple Buffalo boards and a Qnap, all
> > essentially the same chip.
> >
> > Say, if you find the time, could you run it through strace and post the
> > full output? (strace -o /tmp/kwboot.log -s 256 -T ..).
> >
> > Just see where it bails. Maybe it's some issue worth trying to hack
> > around.
>
>
> Have you tried to put the bootrom in the debug mode ?
>
> https://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:tutoriels:u-boot.uart#boot_from_uart0
>
> R?fs :
> http://www.marvell.com/embedded-processors/kirkwood/assets/FS_88F6180_9x_6281_OpenSource.pdf
>
> May be it can helps to understand the 1.11 and 1.21 differences ?

I never played with it. But according to the documentation, it's rather
orthogonal to image upload. You get a command line interface. However, I
see no command references in the docs.

Might support entering it in kwboot in the future, but I don't see how
it's would help with the protocol issues.

Daniel