[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] microblaze: avoid compile error on systems without cfi flash

[Stephan Linz <linz@li-pro.net>]

Am Montag, den 25.06.2012, 06:55 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek: 
> On 06/21/2012 09:42 PM, Stephan Linz wrote:
> > Use XILINX_FLASH_START to set/unset FLASH and RAMENV.
> >
> > Error was:
> > board.c: In function 'board_init':
> > board.c:134: error: 'XILINX_FLASH_START' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > board.c:134: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > board.c:134: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Linz<linz@li-pro.net>
> > ---
> >   include/configs/microblaze-generic.h |   14 +++++++++-----
> >   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h b/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > index 295d123..2ef7d62 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,15 @@
> >   #define	CONFIG_MICROBLAZE	1
> >   #define	MICROBLAZE_V5		1
> >
> > +/* linear flash memory */
> > +#ifdef XILINX_FLASH_START
> > +#define	FLASH
> > +#undef	RAMENV	/* hold environment in flash */
> > +#else
> > +#undef	FLASH
> > +#define	RAMENV	/* hold environment in RAM */
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   /* uart */
> >   #ifdef XILINX_UARTLITE_BASEADDR
> >   # define CONFIG_XILINX_UARTLITE
> > @@ -164,9 +173,6 @@
> >   /* stack */
> >   #define	CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET	CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_BASE
> >
> > -/*#define	RAMENV */
> > -#define	FLASH
> > -
> >   #ifdef FLASH
> >   # define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE		XILINX_FLASH_START
> >   # define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_SIZE		XILINX_FLASH_SIZE
> > @@ -200,8 +206,6 @@
> >   # define CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE	1
> >   # define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE	0x1000
> >   # define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR	(CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE - CONFIG_ENV_SIZE)
> > -/* hardware flash protection */
> > -# define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_PROTECTION
> 
> What's wrong with hardware flash protection?

Nothing, but it will defined twice. One time in line 182 and one time in
that line 204. I think the last one is wrong, because that define is
outside the Flash configuration context, or not?

Sorry, I should split the patch. Should I do this?


br,
Stephan