public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: increase CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:09:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350425362.3502.28.camel@tellur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350424209-11186-4-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>

Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2012, 15:50 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> The SPL has grown. Increase CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE so SPL's BSS does not
> overlap the main U-Boot.
> 
Is there any specific reason why the SPL is now bigger than before? Or
is this just because of the general U-Boot rework (like serial multi
anywhere)? And by how much has it grown? This is really more out of
curiosity rather than any real objection.

Aside from this I think the general idea is reasonable, as we are not
shipping a particularly slim U-Boot on any Tegra platform, nor do we
have to hit a hard size limit, so for the series:

Acked-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  include/configs/tegra20-common.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/configs/tegra20-common.h b/include/configs/tegra20-common.h
> index dc7444d..ced278d 100644
> --- a/include/configs/tegra20-common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/tegra20-common.h
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
>  #define PHYS_SDRAM_1		NV_PA_SDRC_CS0
>  #define PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE	0x20000000	/* 512M */
>  
> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE	0x0010c000
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE	0x0010d000
>  #define CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE	PHYS_SDRAM_1
>  
>  #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR	CONFIG_STACKBASE

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-16 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 21:50 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] ARM: fix u-boot.lds for -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections Stephen Warren
2012-10-16 21:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] ARM: tegra: combine duplicate Makefile rules Stephen Warren
2012-10-18  0:01   ` Simon Glass
2012-10-16 21:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] ARM: tegra: check for SPL size overflow in makefile Stephen Warren
2012-10-18  0:03   ` Simon Glass
2012-10-18  3:18     ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18 16:27   ` Tom Rini
2012-10-18 20:45     ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18 20:50       ` Tom Rini
2012-10-16 21:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: increase CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE Stephen Warren
2012-10-16 22:09   ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2012-10-16 22:43     ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18  0:05       ` Simon Glass
2012-10-18  3:20         ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18 16:31           ` Tom Rini
2012-10-18 20:42             ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-17 23:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] ARM: fix u-boot.lds for -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections Simon Glass
2012-10-18  3:17   ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18 20:36     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-10-18 20:58       ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-18 21:17         ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-20 10:31           ` Albert ARIBAUD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1350425362.3502.28.camel@tellur \
    --to=dev@lynxeye.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox