From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:42:58 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/22] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl
In-Reply-To: <20121030211256.GD15024@bill-the-cat> (from trini@ti.com on Tue
	Oct 30 16:12:56 2012)
Message-ID: <1352846578.8583.11@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 10/30/2012 04:12:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:17:04PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 10/30/2012 12:04:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tested on p2020rdb-pca and p1020rdb-pc.
> > >>
> > >> Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves (1):
> > >>   Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the Makefile
> > >>
> > >> Scott Wood (21):
> > >[snip]
> > >>   spl: rename u-boot-pad.bin to u-boot-with-spl.bin
> > >
> > >OK, one thing I'm missing is where is PAD_TO being set?
> >
> > It isn't.
> >
> > >I thought when this was talked about before I was saying we should
> > >set a soft default
> > >of 1 or something so we can re-use this target?
> >
> > Right, I'd forgotten about that.  It seems to work though with
> > PAD_TO being empty.
> 
> Indeed.  Shame on me for not checking that before but a trivial test
> locally shows that works.
> 
> Assuming you have no further comments about Stefan's mpc5200 series  
> I'll
> pull his in tomorrow'ish, but with a few parts of your series (these  
> two
> patches, the fixup gcc test one) as well instead of what he has, to  
> try
> and make things go a little quicker.

Were you still going to do this, or should I go ahead and prepare a  
pull request for my stuff?

-Scott