From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:09:55 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [DFU] Implement NAND dfu support In-Reply-To: <1355153072-6047-1-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com> (from panto@antoniou-consulting.com on Mon Dec 10 09:24:32 2012) Message-ID: <1355188195.5334.24@snotra> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 12/10/2012 09:24:32 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Introduce on-the fly DFU NAND support. > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou > --- > drivers/dfu/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 7 ++ > drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 194 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dfu.h | 23 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 225 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c What is DFU? I don't see anything in README or doc/, despite there already being CONFIG symbols for it. > +static int nand_block_op(enum dfu_nand_op op, struct dfu_entity *dfu, > + u64 offset, void *buf, long *len) > +{ > + char cmd_buf[DFU_CMD_BUF_SIZE]; > + u64 start, count; > + int ret; > + int dev; > + loff_t actual; > + > + /* if buf == NULL return total size of the area */ > + if (buf == NULL) { > + *len = dfu->data.nand.size; > + return 0; > + } > + > + start = dfu->data.nand.start + offset + dfu->bad_skip; > + count = *len; > + if (start + count > > + dfu->data.nand.start + dfu->data.nand.size) { > + printf("%s: block_op out of bounds\n", __func__); > + return -1; > + } > + dev = nand_curr_device; > + if (dev < 0 || dev >= CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE || > + !nand_info[dev].name) { > + printf("%s: invalid nand device\n", __func__); > + return -1; > + } > + > + sprintf(cmd_buf, "nand %s %p %llx %llx", > + op == DFU_OP_READ ? "read" : "write", > + buf, start, count); > + > + debug("%s: %s 0x%p\n", __func__, cmd_buf, cmd_buf); > + ret = run_command(cmd_buf, 0); Why not use the C interface to NAND? > + /* find out how much actual bytes have been written */ > + /* the difference is the amount of skip we must add from now on > */ > + actual = nand_extent_skip_bad(&nand_info[dev], start, count); ...especially since you already need to interact with it here? -Scott