From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:53:17 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs: Add NAND fdt and ramdisk partition to m28evk In-Reply-To: (from otavio@ossystems.com.br on Thu Jan 3 18:49:05 2013) References: <1356484120-15740-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201212260413.42259.marex@denx.de> <1357256540.22404.16@snotra> Message-ID: <1357314797.666.1@snotra> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 01/03/2013 06:49:05 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Scott Wood > wrote: > > On 12/26/2012 12:26:13 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > Dear Otavio Salvador, > >> > > >> >> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Marek Vasut > wrote: > >> >> > Adjust the NAND partitioning layout so that there is a > separate > >> >> > partition > >> >> > for the ramdisk and fdt blob on the NAND. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > >> >> > >> >> A partition for a ramdisk? maybe initramfs or initrd might be > better? > >> > > >> > Separate ramdisk (initrd). > >> > >> So maybe name it 'initrd' in the partition table? > > > > > > Why bias users against using initramfs instead? > > I have nothing against initramfs or any other name, I just think > 'ramdisk' is confusing (but it might be just my impression) that's why > I commented in the patch so others can comment on it too. How is an abbreviation for "initial ramdisk" less confusing than "ramdisk"? -Scott