From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:19:44 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] cc-list modified? In-Reply-To: <50FCAD91.6080200@ahsoftware.de> (from holler@ahsoftware.de on Sun Jan 20 20:53:05 2013) References: <1358479053.13978.30@snotra> <50F97929.2020507@ahsoftware.de> <50FCAD91.6080200@ahsoftware.de> Message-ID: <1358792384.31204.2@snotra> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 01/20/2013 08:53:05 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 18.01.2013 17:32, schrieb Alexander Holler: >> Am 18.01.2013 04:17, schrieb Scott Wood: >>> On 01/17/2013 07:22:57 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: >>>> Am 18.01.2013 01:50, schrieb Alexander Holler: >>>> >>>> (...) >>>>> Yes. Sounds nice at first, but there will be no end of features >>>>> people >>>>> would want afterwards. Next will be video tutorials and fancy >>>>> sound. ;) >>>> (...) >>>> >>>> I've just wondered what happened to the cc-list of that mail I >>>> sent. >>>> >>>> I've send it with >>>> >>>> CC: Simon Glass , >>>> U-Boot Mailing List , >>>> Jeroen Hofstee >>>> >>>> and received it just with >>>> >>>> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List , >>>> Jeroen Hofstee >>>> >>>> Looks like mailman is confused. >>> >>> Yes, this is a very old known bug in mailman: >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266161 >> >> Thanks for the pointer. >> >> I've now disabled that "avoid duplicates" option as the bug suggests. >> Good to know that such seems to be needed for mailman lists. > > I've just checked my last post, and it happened again. What do you mean by "it"? Your address got dropped from CC, or Simon's? > So disabling that knob (avoid duplicates) in the (my) preferences > doesn't help. It's the preferences of the person who's being dropped from the CC list that matter (supposedly). > Looking at those two mails, I think mailman just deletes every CC in > the list which is before the address of the mailing list itself. I'm pretty sure I've seen droppage that wasn't consistent with that rule (e.g. the list was in To:). -Scott