From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:58:18 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 13/19] Makefile: u-boot-with-spl.bin: Fix
 SPL padding
In-Reply-To: <1170668470.1542169.1361190495237.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
	(from benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com on Mon Feb 18 06:28:15 2013)
References: <1360961665-10693-1-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
	<1360961665-10693-13-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
	<1954515158.1528901.1361117809127.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
	<1170668470.1542169.1361190495237.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
Message-ID: <1361210298.14186.1@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 02/18/2013 06:28:15 AM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> I'm also wondering why there is both generic SPL for NAND and legacy  
> "NAND SPL"
> for p1_p2_rdb, all the more the "NAND SPL" version does not seem to  
> be used in
> boards.cfg.

"p1_p2_rdb_pc" and "P1_P2_RDB" are different targets (unfortunately).   
The former is for newer boards and has been converted to the new SPL.   
The latter is for older boards, which I do not have access to and have  
had a hard time getting information about (which would be required to  
merge the two targets).  Perhaps P1_P2_RDB should just be removed.

-Scott