public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:10:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361823013.27903.8@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361816397-8661-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> (from marex@denx.de on Mon Feb 25 12:19:54 2013)

On 02/25/2013 12:19:54 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Implement u-boot.nand target that can be reused with a small amount of
> churn across all CPU models. The idea is to delegate the u-boot.nand  
> target
> out of the main Makefile and into the CPU's Makefile (very similar to  
> what
> u-boot.imx does now). The main Makefile shall only contain path to  
> which the
> u-boot.nand target is delegated. Hopefully this will not produce too  
> much
> bloat in the main Makefile.
> 
> To demonstrate this implementation, add u-boot.nand target for i.MX53.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---
>  Makefile                     |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 41054b7..8b1010a 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -470,6 +470,23 @@ $(obj)u-boot.img:	$(obj)u-boot.bin
>  $(obj)u-boot.imx: $(obj)u-boot.bin depend
>  		$(MAKE) -C $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common  
> $(obj)u-boot.imx
> 
> +#
> +# Generic u-boot.nand target.
> +#
> +# Every CPU that needs u-boot.nand must add a path to an  
> implementation of
> +# the actual u-boot.nand generator below.
> +#
> +ifdef CONFIG_MX53
> +CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH := $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common
> +endif
> +
> +$(obj)u-boot.nand: $(obj)u-boot.bin depend
> +		if [ "X$(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH)X" = "XX" ] ;  
> then		\
> +			echo "This CPU does not support u-boot.nand  
> target!" ;	\
> +			exit 1  
> ;						\
> +		fi
> +		$(MAKE) -C $(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH) $(obj)u-boot.nand

We already have CONFIG_SPL_TARGET.  Why do we need a new mechanism  
specific to NAND, with ifdefs in the main Makefile?

If we do have something specific to NAND, it should be u-boot-nand.bin  
to match what nand_spl produced, and it should just be a generic rule  
that links to what CONFIG_SPL_TARGET produced, if the right CONFIG  
symbol is set by the board config to say that this is a NAND SPL.  Or  
is someone going to say that they want to generate multiple different  
SPL images from the same build? :-P

-Scott

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-25 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-25 18:19 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 18:19 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:13   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 21:07     ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 21:16       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 18:19 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx5: Add NAND clock handling Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:27   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 18:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mx5: Add support for DENX M53EVK Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 19:33   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26 13:52   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-02-26 19:32   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-14 17:20     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-14 19:07       ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-14 19:18         ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 18:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-25 21:09   ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 21:13     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26  1:02   ` [U-Boot] patch error wanxs
2013-02-25 20:10 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-02-25 21:10   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common: imx: Implement generic u-boot.nand target Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 22:15     ` Scott Wood
2013-02-25 23:03       ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-25 23:07         ` Scott Wood
2013-02-25 23:50           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-26  7:19             ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-26 11:33               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-27 17:33                 ` Tom Rini
2013-02-28 18:50                   ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-28 18:53                     ` Tom Rini
2013-02-26  7:17           ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-26 23:10             ` Scott Wood
2013-02-27 22:18 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-27 23:44   ` Tom Rini
2013-02-27 23:47     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 12:18       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 14:03   ` Tom Rini
2013-02-28 15:24     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:06       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:21         ` Tom Rini
2013-02-28 16:29           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-28 16:42             ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1361823013.27903.8@snotra \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox