From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/4] env_nand.c: clarify log messages when env reading fails
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:40:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361832004.27903.14@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130225093912.GD17784@philter.vipri.net> (from phil.sutter@viprinet.com on Mon Feb 25 03:39:12 2013)
On 02/25/2013 03:39:12 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Scott,
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:59:41PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > We should also give a message if one of the CRCs is bad, though
> that's
> > an existing problem.
>
> Yes, that would be nice. While writing this, I also had the idea of
> introducing some macros for unified message output, like so:
>
> | #define __print(level, ...) {
> | printf("*** %s - ", level);
> | printf(__VA_ARGS__);
> | printf("\n");
> | }
> | #define perror(...) __print("Error", __VA_ARGS__)
> | #define pwarn(...) __print("Warning", __VA_ARGS__)
> | ...
>
> What do you think? That would require diligently touching a lot of
> source files, of course.
This suggestion belongs in its own thread with an appropriate subject,
but if we do anything like this we should use pr_warn(), pr_err(), etc.
since we share a bunch of code with Linux -- although output from that
code may be made worse since it's not expecting the prefixes...
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 12:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Optimized nand_read_buf for kirkwood Phil Sutter
2012-11-21 12:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] env_nand.c: support falling back to redundant env when writing Phil Sutter
2012-11-27 22:04 ` Scott Wood
2012-11-28 21:06 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-06 18:18 ` Scott Wood
2012-12-07 11:53 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-07 16:58 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-07 17:38 ` Scott Wood
2012-12-10 13:41 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-11 23:12 ` Scott Wood
2012-12-20 21:28 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-20 21:41 ` Scott Wood
2012-12-21 10:34 ` Phil Sutter
2012-12-22 2:29 ` Scott Wood
2012-11-21 12:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] env_nand.c: do warn only if really no valid environment could be loaded Phil Sutter
2012-11-27 22:06 ` Scott Wood
2012-11-27 22:07 ` Scott Wood
2013-02-20 0:33 ` Scott Wood
2012-11-21 12:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] common/env_nand.c: calculate crc only when readenv was OK Phil Sutter
2012-11-26 3:46 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Optimized nand_read_buf for kirkwood Prafulla Wadaskar
2012-11-26 10:29 ` Phil Sutter
2012-11-26 10:33 ` Phil Sutter
2012-11-26 23:39 ` Scott Wood
2012-12-20 6:44 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2012-12-20 10:55 ` Phil Sutter
2013-02-21 17:21 ` [U-Boot] Version 2 of Kirkwood and env_nand improvements Phil Sutter
2013-02-21 17:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 1/4] Optimized nand_read_buf for kirkwood (V3) Phil Sutter
2013-02-23 1:26 ` Scott Wood
2013-02-21 17:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 2/4] env_nand.c: support falling back to redundant env when writing Phil Sutter
2013-02-23 1:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-02-21 17:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/4] env_nand.c: clarify log messages when env reading fails Phil Sutter
2013-02-23 1:59 ` Scott Wood
2013-02-25 9:39 ` Phil Sutter
2013-02-25 22:40 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-02-21 17:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 4/4] common/env_nand.c: calculate crc only when readenv was OK Phil Sutter
2013-02-23 2:00 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-26 18:25 ` [U-Boot] Version 3 of Kirkwood and env_nand improvements Phil Sutter
2013-06-26 18:25 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] Optimized nand_read_buf for kirkwood Phil Sutter
2013-06-27 10:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-08-19 23:29 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,1/2] " Scott Wood
2013-06-26 18:25 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] env_nand.c: support falling back to redundant env when writing Phil Sutter
2013-07-17 22:25 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-19 10:09 ` Phil Sutter
2013-07-19 10:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Phil Sutter
2013-07-19 10:30 ` Phil Sutter
2013-08-22 22:50 ` [U-Boot] " Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1361832004.27903.14@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox