public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] command/cache: Add flush_cache command
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:48:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363823318.25034.33@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BABA974-A22D-4FD7-9678-035DD5AE5107@prograde.net> (from mboards@prograde.net on Wed Mar 20 18:33:41 2013)

On 03/20/2013 06:33:41 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>  
> wrote:
> 
> > Really, instead of adding one command, you want to modify *two*  
> commands to do the same thing separately, which involves changing the  
> syntax of both commands to accept memory range information?
> 
> What is the purpose of limiting the memory range to be flushed? Is  
> there a reason one might want to NOT flush certain data sitting in a  
> dirty cache line out to memory before doing a go or boot command?

Because it would take a while to flush all of RAM?

> If you drive the operation as a "walk the cache" process rather than  
> a "iterate over all SDRAM physical address space to cherry pick  
> within a range" it wouldn't seem that slow. I mean, there's only so  
> much cache memory.

There's no way to "walk the cache" on many chips, including ours.   
There are generally ways to flush the entire thing, but they are (more)  
hardware-specific than using the architected method of flushing a  
memory range, and sometimes these methods have errata associated with  
them.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-19 20:29 [U-Boot] [RFC] command/cache: Add flush_cache command York Sun
2013-03-19 22:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-19 22:07   ` York Sun
2013-03-19 23:32     ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 13:59       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 14:58         ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 16:43           ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 17:38             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 18:16               ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 19:15             ` Tom Rini
2013-03-20 19:36               ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 19:59                 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-20 21:31                   ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21  5:42                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21  5:39                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 12:29                     ` Tom Rini
2013-03-21 13:37                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 18:22                         ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 19:25                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 20:34                             ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22  6:30                               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-22 12:17                                 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 14:03                                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-22 14:29                                     ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 15:57                                       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-22 16:48                                       ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22 17:19                                         ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 20:39                                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 22:11                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 22:35                   ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 23:33                     ` Michael Cashwell
2013-03-20 23:48                       ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-03-21  0:27                         ` Michael Cashwell
2013-03-21  0:31                           ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21  5:02                             ` Sricharan R
2013-03-21 18:51                               ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 17:58                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-21 18:07                       ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 19:21                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 19:40               ` York Sun
2013-03-20 14:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 16:44   ` Scott Wood
2013-04-03 14:02 ` Jim Chargin
2013-04-18 17:09   ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363823318.25034.33@snotra \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox