From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] command/cache: Add flush_cache command
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:31:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363825902.25034.37@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <867D8C0F-FE72-49A5-915D-470E731437C4@prograde.net> (from mboards@prograde.net on Wed Mar 20 19:27:29 2013)
On 03/20/2013 07:27:29 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 03/20/2013 06:33:41 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote:
> >
> >> What is the purpose of limiting the memory range to be flushed? Is
> there a reason one might want to NOT flush certain data sitting in a
> dirty cache line out to memory before doing a go or boot command?
> >
> > Because it would take a while to flush all of RAM?
>
> "Flushing all of RAM" is what trips me up. Fundamentally, that puts
> the cart in front of the horse. The goal isn't to flush all of RAM
> but rather to flush all of cache.
Right, I was just responding to your question of, "What is the purpose
of limiting the memory range to be flushed?"
> Iterating over the small thing rather than the large would seem
> reasonably efficient.
>
> But as you say, if there are architectures where that can't be done
> and you must pass GBs of physical address space (rather than KB of
> cache space) through some process then range limiting it does make
> sense.
Right. The range specified is a minimum to be flushed -- if a
particular architecture finds it easier/quicker to flush everything
instead, that's fine.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 20:29 [U-Boot] [RFC] command/cache: Add flush_cache command York Sun
2013-03-19 22:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-19 22:07 ` York Sun
2013-03-19 23:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 13:59 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 14:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 16:43 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 17:38 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 18:16 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 19:15 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-20 19:36 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 19:59 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-20 21:31 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 5:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 5:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 12:29 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-21 13:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 18:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 19:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-21 20:34 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22 6:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-22 12:17 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 14:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-22 14:29 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 15:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-22 16:48 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22 17:19 ` Tom Rini
2013-03-22 20:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 22:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-20 22:35 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-20 23:33 ` Michael Cashwell
2013-03-20 23:48 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 0:27 ` Michael Cashwell
2013-03-21 0:31 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-03-21 5:02 ` Sricharan R
2013-03-21 18:51 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 17:58 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-21 18:07 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-21 19:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 19:40 ` York Sun
2013-03-20 14:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-03-20 16:44 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-03 14:02 ` Jim Chargin
2013-04-18 17:09 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363825902.25034.37@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox